Critical Policy Sociology

This week we analyzed an issue that I am convinced will be very important in the development of my research. The analysis of politics goes far beyond a linguistic dissection of words and phrases. An intersectional analysis of the policy is required: that is, its formulation, influences, promulgation and opposition.

In this approach, it is necessary to identify the researcher. The declaration of positionality is mandatory in this type of work. Critical policy researchers are also interested in who says things, who decides what is important or valuable, who can have their voices heard and the voice of those who are considered legitimate.

Stephen Ball is one of the authors that stand out in this type of research. It is interesting that although his work is influenced by Foucault's theories and concepts, he does not consider himself a Foucauldian. Ball believes that politics is seen as a discourse, since politics offers us ways of seeing the world, of doing things; this is the enabling capacity, or also limiting the discourse.

Regarding this topic I will try to summarize those points that can contribute to the development of my research:

·        • Declare my positionality.

·        • Analyze possible abnormal behaviours (deviant) caused by the implementation of the policy.

·        • Identify winners and losers.

·        • Consider the consequences or unintended results of the policy in the field.